What’s Wrong with US Education

9 Mar

What is wrong with U.S. Education? When we start letting politicians tell “neurosurgeons how to operate in the ICUs” or “full-fledged college degreed teachers in their classrooms,” when we allow politicians to use education to profit from the billions of dollars it generates on a yearly basis by privatizations.
Passing a child at all cost from one grade to another is ridiculous to start with, since a child’s education achievement level is not dependent per se on one’s chronological age; but rather on the intellectual maturation, which develops variably according to each individual’s DNA make-up and background.
Any reasonable scholar would be aware of this notion of capacity and readiness. The mere thought of Cohorts or No Child Left Behind, for that matter, shows such vast lack of judgement and intellect on the part of our leaders and politicians. But what’s new there? When “Education Outsiders” are allowed to make decisions, when their only concerns are popular votes and careers?!
Worse even, politicians leave, very conveniently I must add, the parents’ and children’s responsibilities out of their political equation, putting all the blame on the teachers, whose college degrees’ are not even being recognized anylonger.
I often wonder, when are our Colleges’ and Universities’ Presidents, Boards of Colleges and other Education Scholars, supposedly Free Thinkers… going to react to these constant attacks, from $$$-Corporations, on their integrity?
Politics ought to remain out of our U.S. Education System. There is a very good reason why our forefathers never mentioned Education anywhere in the U.S. Constitution or Bill of Rights.. Obviously, to avoid propaganda and brainwashing… which are both occuring nowadays, because No One Dares Speaking the Truth!
By Christian W. DePrins

REACH

7 Mar

Rockford Educators Advocating Civil Treatment Meeting

 

When:  Thursday, March 14, 2013, 4:00 p.m.

Where: Just Goods, 201 7th Street

Please come if you feel your story needs to be told regarding mistreatment by the district. Our numbers are growing and we will consider our next option as a group.

Contact: Jane Hayes 815-980-9192 or Mary Jo Powers 815-978-9429 if you have questions.

 

 

TRRT Editorial

13 Feb

How many of you in this community really know about the rampant problems in Rockford Public School District 205? Well, as Watchdogs, we do!

Unless you personally know any of the teachers who have given their lives to their students and career in education and now have been walked from their classrooms in shame, you probably don’t know. It’s time for you to become aware of the problems to remove the shades!

REACT, an off-shoot group of WEE (Watchdogs for Ethics in Education), our watchdog group for ethics in education, has been meeting with teachers who have been unfairly dismissed, humiliated, and uninformed of their so-called transgressions by district administration and the REA, Rockford Education Association.

REACT stands for Rockford Educators Advocating Civil Treatment. We have met with a lawyer and teachers put on administrative leave, and now correspond with Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan (D) about such abuses.

Poor teachers, as well as other professionals, need to be remediated, no doubt. However, we are finding many of those released were conscientiously doing their jobs. Perhaps they have spoken too loudly and resisted wrongs in this district! Perhaps they have been targeted because they are building representatives for their union? Perhaps their salaries are too high, so two new teachers could be hired for the one dismissed. Unfortunately, free speech suffers and is shackled by fear and intimidation when this happens.

It’s time to inform you — the public, parents and taxpayers — of this travesty of justice. Unfortunately, many such abuses occur to teachers who have tenure, admirable reputations and longevity in this district. We question the way they have been mistreated and if their civil rights have been violated by a lack of timely due process and/or legal representation. We are encouraging them to seek private counsel, which is costly but more effective than representation from the REA.

Is ageism alive and well in this district? Actually, it seems apparent and also seems to be a national trend, eliminating teachers with advanced degrees and numerous years of experience. Those of us who have been educators for many years remember the process of remediation. When that was not successful, a teacher was terminated.

Now, instead of the hassle of coping with indignities from the district and union, many of these teachers have chosen to leave the classroom and retire. What a shame, though, because these are the very teachers who often mentor the newbies encouraging them to maintain teaching as a noble profession and guiding them in classroom management skills! They also tend to be more vocal; now, they are silenced because of fear of retribution.

For their years of service, efforts and advocacy for students, these experienced teachers are exited from their classrooms and buildings, often during the school day. Humiliation beyond belief! Many have suffered inescapable health, financial and familial worries.

Whom do we thank for downsizing and humiliating our staff when the central administration keeps hiring more people to do their jobs? Hasn’t this been the business model so often decried throughout recent history? Where is the sense of loyalty or community veteran teachers remember?

Now, how does this impact you as parents? Think about your children being taught by substitutes. And then, think about how many buildings cannot even get adequate substitutes, which then overloads other teachers. Think about the cost entailed by our district paying for two teachers at a time; then, consider the legal costs incurred. Oh, but that’s right, we have to keep the lawyers busy with their $200-per-hour wages while subs in Rockford make about $65 per day! Since this is the lowest rate in the area, many subs choose to offer their services to other districts rather than District 205. Less hassle, more money — logical!

It’s time to be informed and become advocates! Ask your children if their classroom teacher has left the building. Be aware of their progress if they have a substitute teacher. This dire situation is apparent to most educators throughout our district, but now, the public needs to know so YOU can respond.

And just maybe, it’s time to write a book about the machinations of present and past school board members and administrators, the nepotism and rewards for the powerful elite, the impact of business alignments, the needless pervasive testing, the lack of support from District 205 for its staff, and the indignities and corruption so widely apparent throughout this district. There is almost too much to uncover in just one book!

If you really care to know the truth, here are some websites to keep yourselves informed:

http://www.facebook.com/groups/parentsunitedforeducation/

http://watchdogsforethicsineducation.com

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Watchthecorruption/383906948371091

http://illinoisattorneygeneral.gov

Speak up for justice and civil liberties! Remove the shades!

Jane Hayes is a member of Watchdogs for Ethics in Education and Rockford Educators Advocating Civil Treatment.

School Board Speech

12 Feb

      Tonight I address your myopic or shortsighted vision. Education as a profession has had a long history of sacrifice and service. As teachers, our jobs have been far more than academic. In fact, covering curriculum is the last of our duties as we test our students in mind-numbing standardized to appease your shortsighted need for data. Our children deserve to be seen as far more than a number on a test.

 

      I see how important your alliance is with commerce and industry, but that is so far from why most educators choose this as a profession. We are loyal to student development and independent thought and have sacrificed time with our own families to be good teachers. We have chosen education not for the dollars but for the sense, common sense that is when we recognize the impact good teachers have on the future of our society.

 

      Now, for our efforts, many of us are walked from our classrooms during the school day and from our buildings in disgrace without even knowing our errors. After a lifetime of service this aligns clearly with an insensitive business model of downsizing which lacks consideration and courtesy. Where is the humanity in this indignity? So now you have a temporary fix by paying a substitute and the teacher put on administrative leave. However, the injustice done to these people leaves a lifelong scar. The bottom line is that everyone is replaceable because there are numerous inexperienced teachers who are cheaper on your payrolls, but I question how long they will last without mentoring from our veteran teachers.

 

      You need to read If Aristotle Ran General Motors  by Tom Morris. Drop such unethical practices, your costly legal bills, and your hubris. Such self-serving pride doesn’t serve us well. Education has an ethical and moral base that is not served by such disgraceful tactics.

      You need to treat your employees with civility and common sense.

      You need to investigate this practice immediately.

     

We cannot be sustained without the truth, beauty, goodness, and unity, and such failures divide us.

You need to remove your shades before you morally bankrupt district 205 because we all deserve better.

PR Battle in Chicago Schools

16 Mar
Chicago Public Schools has parted ways with the head of its family and community engagement efforts, a casualty of the public relations battle over the district’s controversial push for school closings, school turnarounds and an extended school day.

Jamiko Rose resigned as chief family and community engagement officer on March 9, just seven months after her appointment by CPS chief Jean-Claude Brizard. Rose, a former executive director of an education and social justice nonprofit, was hired to spearhead work with parents and the public during the wholesale restructuring of CPS under Mayor Rahm Emanuel.

Rose’s work was seen as critical to stemming public criticism over the mayor’s education reform agenda. But from the beginning, she seemed to rankle community members with poorly organized parent meetings, some that began at 8 a.m. on weekdays.

Rose was criticized both inside and outside CPS for not working closely enough with parents and the community to calm concerns. Some characterized her as aloof and unfit for the position. Others simply said her efforts were not enough to overcome the turbulent times.

Rose, who will remain at CPS until May 31, said her decision to leave was a “mutual agreement” with the district.

“I came to the district to serve the public,” Rose said. “At this point, I feel that I can best serve the public outside of the district.”

Although many parents and community members have openly supported lengthening CPS’ school day and shuttering or turning around struggling neighborhood schools, public reaction in some parts of the city has been fiercely critical.

In February, Local School Council members at 17 schools filed a lawsuit, claiming that CPS’ school closings were discriminatory and intended to silence parental voice in school decisions. That case has since been dismissed. Elsewhere, parents and community activists have staged rowdy protests at schools designated to be closed and at City Hall to make their opposition known.

Last month, dozens of parents, activists and community members flooded CPS’ school board chambers to oppose the closing or restructuring of 17 struggling public schools. The emotionally charged meeting lasted 31/2 hours, but at the end school board members unanimously approved all school actions.

“The department (of community engagement) has always just been window dressing for CPS, pretending to listen to parents and the community,” said Julie Woestehoff, executive director of the advocacy group Parents United for Responsible Education. “The bottom line is, they’re not interested in including the public in their decisions at all.”

District spokeswoman Becky Carroll declined to talk about Rose’s resignation, but she said community and family engagement is a crucial component of CPS’ mission.

“Historically, CPS has not done as good a job as it should have engaging families,” Carroll said. “And we are working to fundamentally change that with a new approach … to ensure that we have the most responsive and proactive effort in place to fully engage and empower parents.”

nahmed@tribune.com jhood@tribune.com

Whistleblower Knows the Truth

11 Mar

Kathleen Carroll, an attorney and fired whistleblower at the California Commission On Teacher Credentials attended the March 5, 2012 rally for public education at the State Capitol and talks about the organized destruction of public education in California and who is responsible for this crisis. Included in her comments is the role of Apple and other online education companies who are draining funds from public schools. She also calls for the investigation and prosecution of illegal actions by lobbyists funded by the Gates Foundation and Broad Foundation who are illegally voting on public money to private schools in which they have an economic interest. She questions why California Attorney General Kamala Harris has refused to investigate and also whey Governor Jerry Brown is continuing to allow criminal activity at the Commission On Teacher Credentials. The California Commission On Teacher Credentials is under the direct authority of Governor Brown and his office.
For further video on Kathleen Carroll go to:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOCjDI2WxZA&feature
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56SWb4z5-l4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLa6YCVB-8A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ux7F71oUo0
Production of Labor Video Project www.laborvideo.org

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFlOt-r5z90&feature=player_embedded

Diane Ravitch Speaks Out!

8 Mar

Why are the elites of both parties so eager to hand children and public dollars over to private corporations? Why are both parties complicit in the dismantling of public education? Why do so many Democrats at the top advocate what used to be known as the right-wing agenda for education? Is it all about campaign contributions? Why does the media let them get away with it? Why does anyone think that this will be good for our society in the short term or the long term? Why have the monied interests decided to privatize large swaths of public education? What happens to our democracy when the public sector is effectively whittled away or purchased by big money? Diane

Pema Chodron Speaks Out

7 Mar

March 7, 2012

FEARLESSNESS AND PATIENCE

Fearlessness is another ingredient of patience. If you want to practice patience that leads to the cessation of suffering, to the de-escalation of aggression, it means cultivating a fearlessness that is both compassionate and brave. Because at this point you’re getting to know anger and how it easily breeds violent words and actions, and this can be decidedly unnerving.

Ombudsman Program vs. Roosevelt & Page Park

5 Mar

Ombudsman program fails to meet the needs of students
By Jennifer Macek
My name is Jennifer Macek. I grew up in Rockford, I attended the Rockford Public Schools, and I did my senior research paper for my bachelor of science on the history of the Rockford Public Schools. Currently, I am a teacher, parent and resident of District 205. I am working on my doctorate in curriculum and instruction at Northern Illinois University, I am a certified instruction for CPI for this district, and I was previously employed by Ombudsman in Loves Park.
I am writing to ask you to listen to reason. For too long, this district has looked for the quick fix to many complex issues. For too long, we have tried to fix long-term problems with short-term solutions. For too long, the district has made cuts and changes to save money that resulted in waste, increased spending and a decrease in revenue. Examples of this include implementing programs, such as ENI that cost more than $5 million that the district scrapped after purchasing all the materials and training staff, and closing schools that resulted in the People who Care lawsuit, which cost the district millions of dollars. Now, we are looking at new programs and changes to existing programs that take this district one step forward and two steps back.
Along with several of my colleagues in the Alternative High School program, I am putting together a think tank to help make the board, the district and the community aware of the direction currently being offered and the consequences that will follow should the board implement the recommendations the district is making. We are also investigating alternatives that will be cost effective and economically efficient for the present and the long run, without jeopardizing academic integrity.
We will be looking at the Ombudsman program in depth. Already, we have found that the statistics presented to our staff by Matt Vosberg Feb. 15 are misleading. He stated that Ombudsman has an 85 percent graduation rate, when according to their website they have 85 percent who graduate, earn credits OR return to their home school. There are many other aspects of this program that fail to meet the needs of our students, and we will be sharing that information as soon as we compile all that is needed to ensure our information is valid.
We will also share the new initiatives Roosevelt has implemented to promote efficiency and success. These improvements began prior to the information we received regarding the proposed changes. Under new leadership, we have created an excellent system for promoting student accountability and academic progress.
In addition, our task force is brainstorming and researching alternatives, such as the following:
1. Ways to increase economic efficiency within an already well-established program (Roosevelt Model of Learning).
2. Creating a credit recovery program within each high school so students who fail first semester subjects are not set up to fail the second semester, etc.
3. Implementing an alternative program at the middle school level.
4. Changing the programming at Page Park to offer credit recovery, to enhance student buy-in and promote student success.
5. Implementing curriculum changes that boost test scores throughout the district.
6. Allowing elementary teachers the freedom to use the proposed extended day for enrichment and RTI, as needed, with the direct goal of decreasing the need for credit recovery in the future.
We will continue to brainstorm and complete research that will provide the board with the best options to implement money-saving strategies that truly promote the highest standards available. We are doing this because we love our school, our students, and our community; because our students love our school and have found success here. We want to have a world-class education for ALL students. We are not doing this because we are being paid $180,000 a year to do so. We are not doing this because we are trying to save our jobs (we’ve already been told we will have them), and not because we are trying to defy anyone. We are doing this because we care. We understand the current economy, and we want what is best for everyone involved. As a taxpayer, a parent and a teacher of this district, I urge you to listen to reason.
P.S. — The above was written prior to learning about the changes proposed for Roosevelt. I planned to read it at the next board meeting, but now feel we need to move quickly, before any damage is done to the community I care so much about.
From the Feb. 29-March 6, 2012, issue

No Public Education, No Democracy!

28 Feb

Brave New World

by SIMONE HARRIS

I teach English at Montgomery High School in Santa Rosa, California.  I love my school, my amazing colleagues, and the kids who enter my classroom each year.  But I hate what is happening to public education.

From the national to the local level, our public schools are under attack, and that means our students are under attack.  This attack takes more than one form.  The cuts to vital education services are horrifying enough, but they’re only half the picture.  The other half is the violation of our public trust by private interests.

It’s not a pretty sight, but we must look squarely at the vultures of privatization that prey on the damage to our schools, from New York to New Orleans to Wisconsin to California.  Diane Ravitch, former Assistant Secretary of Education in the first Bush administration, refers to the three big education funders, Bill Gates, Eli Broad and the Walton Family, as the Billionaire Boys Club in her excellent book The Death and Life of the Great American School System.  Ravitch has come a long way since her days of working under Bush Sr.  I’ve even heard people refer to her as the Noam Chomsky of education, a sure sign of how far to the right our political culture has drifted.

But we were talking about vultures.  These corporations are poised to supply the artificial heart of learning to a wounded public school system they fully intend to finish off.  But they won’t succeed. No they won’t because our communities are going to fight for our beloved schools, we teachers are going to fight for our students, and our students are going to demand the education they deserve!

There are so many intelligent, talented, compassionate educators who were called to this profession.  Teaching was a calling for me.  I’m in this for the long haul, and by this I mean public education.  I’m going to stand up for the right that all young people have to a quality education.

Education is a right.  Education is a human right; it’s not a humiliating race for basic funding, something the Obama administration and Education Secretary Arne Duncan would do well to remember.  Education is indeed a right, and yet did you know there is more segregation in our schools today than at any time since 1968, the year of Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination?  The corporate obsession with charter schools and high stakes tests has contributed mightily to this segregation while shamefully distracting us from the poverty and income inequality that go hand in hand with it.

I’m not going to lie down while corporations prey on our students.  I don’t want to see our nation’s young people at the mercy of a Rupert Murdoch or a Michael Milken.  Do you remember Michael Milken, the former felon and Junk Bond King of the eighties?  Michael Milkin is co-founder of K-12 Inc., America’s largest provider of online education for kindergarten through 12th grade.

Do you know what an online school is?  That’s the one that exists inside of a computer.  These days, kids can conduct their entire social lives on a computer and get all their schooling done there too.  They never even have to leave the house.  It’s very compact, very efficient, but there is one missing link: the human link, the spacious beauty of the human bond.

Online or virtual schools typically have high withdrawal rates, and that’s not surprising.  It makes sense, doesn’t it?  It must be very tempting to drop out of a “school” when there are no human beings there in person to make you feel connected to a real community, no gym, no playground, no student art on the walls, and no teacher to get to know you, to care, to see who you are and who you might one day become.

The bitter irony is that these online schools are marketed to English learners who need the exact opposite of isolation, who benefit most from cooperative strategies in natural, not virtual, settings.

Or they are preposterously promoted as beneficial to low income students as though it were a good thing to get education at a discount, off the rack. As Diane Ravitch warns of the educational dystopia that is fast gaining on reality, “the poor will get computers and the rich will get computers and teachers.”

The corporate predators also target struggling learners, kids with learning disabilities or emotional problems; in other words, the very kids who need human engagement and interaction the most.  And make no mistake: all kids need it!  One shudders to imagine children as young as five attending a virtual school.  It’s a Brave New World, and I’m not just saying that because I’m an English teacher.

Our district right here in Santa Rosa has just launched an online charter school.  I understand we are paying for it in-house, no involvement from Michael Milkin, not as far as I know, not yet anyway.  But our community needs to ask critical questions about this online school nonetheless, especially when we are told to expect teacher layoffs this March.

According to SRTA President Andy Brennan, the district promised this online venture would be geared toward homeschooled kids but in spite of that claim, they have recruited from our general population.  They forwarded a letter of recruitment to all department chairs in the district and got over 200 applicants.

So why are we diverting precious resources from our actual schools toward this virtual school?  What priorities does this decision reflect?  Who made the decision that an online school was good for our kids?  Were studies consulted, and if so, which ones and with what level of scrutiny? The argument that getting the bulk of one’s education through a computer will give kids marketable technological skills is wholly unconvincing without evidence that students of these virtual schools actually get hired in these fields.  Do the jobs that require these technological skills even exist in the present U.S. economy or have they been outsourced to other countries?

Finally, is it possible that, in our district as in so many others, what is good for our kids once again lost out to the bottom line, the almighty dollar?  These are some of the questions we must ask.

Another question is why we allow Michael Milken, a man who wouldn’t be allowed inside of a real classroom because of his felony conviction, to make a profit off of marketing his online curriculum to kindergartners.

Letting the business world gain control of our public schools has many sad consequences, but there is no question that it is making a few people very rich.  There is a reason that Rupert Murdoch referred to the for-profit K-12 education industry as, and I quote, “a $500 billion sector in the U.S. alone that is waiting desperately to be transformed.”  I’d like to keep Rupert Murdoch waiting desperately until the end of time.  How about you?

And we can’t forget the Walton Family.  The Walton Family spent $157 million dollars on Ed Reform in 2010 alone and has spent $1 billion to date on pushing charter schools and busting teachers unions.  Do we really want the people behind Walmart to set the education agenda for America?  Something is definitely wrong with this picture.

We hear so much these days about standards in education and holding teachers accountable to the standards.  Ask yourself what the Walmart standard of education might be – You’ve heard of the chain store, so now consider the chain school, all those unique kids across the nation being force-fed one standardized diet of junk learning.  It’s the fast food of education these corporations are pushing.  And when I consider the current and future classes of 40 plus students due to budget cuts, the term “supersize me” takes on a whole new meaning.  Hey, how big can an online class get?  Supersize me.

But these days in education, it’s not fashionable to examine the big picture, to ask too many questions about what students are learning and why we are teaching it to them.  It’s not recommended for the teacher and it’s not prescribed for the student.  Nevertheless, we teachers are not about to give up on critical thinking within or beyond the walls of the classroom.

Here is one critical piece of the big picture: The Walton Family owns more wealth than the bottom 40% of the whole U.S. while one in five kids here live in poverty. There is no question that poverty is a huge factor in the success of students.  It accounts for 60% of student achievement!

Finland, the country whose scores in international test comparisons we’ve been holding up as a model, has high-performing schools in large part because they do things like provide food and free health-care for their students.  And not incidentally, they don’t have standardized tests.  They understand that a quality education emerges from a strong community and a humane society.  Why can’t we figure that out here in the U.S., in the wealthiest country in the world?

So if the Walton family really wants to improve education, then maybe they should start supporting Single Payer Healthcare. Maybe they should launch a massive campaign to end child poverty.  And no education reform effort would be complete without a major challenge to the corporate stranglehold on our system of government.  Come to think of it, these philanthropists, as they like to think of themselves, might want to join the Occupy Movement.  Except they’re the owners of Walmart, a conflict of interest to say the least.

The 1% is hoping that if America continues to blame teachers for everything then they will forget to tax the millionaires.  But we here today can’t afford to forget the real scope of the problem.  So as an English teacher, I decided to end my speech today with a nod to the parts of speech.

We can’t forget that Occupy was a verb before it became a noun.  Whatever you believe about your political identity, your party affiliation, your status in America today, please don’t forget to occupy your conscience, your activism, and your humanity. We need to vote in California to fund public education and other essential human services, and I am giving my support to the Millionaires Tax Initiative supported by the California Federation of Teachers and the California Nurses Association.  But we need to do more than rouse ourselves for intermittent election cycles.  We need to occupy our hearts, our minds, and our capacity for critical thinking.  We can’t go back to sleep.

People everywhere are waking up to the radical threat that corporations pose, to our global economy, to our planet and to our very existence as a species.  And let’s not forget that corporations are a threat to our democracy, to the self-determination of people all over the world.  Without public education, there can be no democracy.

This is why we reject this authoritarian education mandated by an illegitimate corporate power.  We must overthrow the plutocracy!  We must demand our human rights! And we cannot afford to wait timidly for politicians powered by big money to give their lukewarm legislative blessings to our kids’ fundamental human rights.  We the people need to take to the streets to demand those rights, to demand the legislation that is just and fair in the wealthiest country in the world. We are the decision-makers and we are the people!

I would never have become a teacher if I didn’t believe in the power of people to change the world, and especially the power of young people.  Students, I know you can change the world!  You can change the world!  I believe in you.

Simone Harris is a high school English teacher, activist, and blogger who writes about the politics of education at theedutalk.blogspot.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.