PR Battle in Chicago Schools

16 Mar
Chicago Public Schools has parted ways with the head of its family and community engagement efforts, a casualty of the public relations battle over the district’s controversial push for school closings, school turnarounds and an extended school day.

Jamiko Rose resigned as chief family and community engagement officer on March 9, just seven months after her appointment by CPS chief Jean-Claude Brizard. Rose, a former executive director of an education and social justice nonprofit, was hired to spearhead work with parents and the public during the wholesale restructuring of CPS under Mayor Rahm Emanuel.

Rose’s work was seen as critical to stemming public criticism over the mayor’s education reform agenda. But from the beginning, she seemed to rankle community members with poorly organized parent meetings, some that began at 8 a.m. on weekdays.

Rose was criticized both inside and outside CPS for not working closely enough with parents and the community to calm concerns. Some characterized her as aloof and unfit for the position. Others simply said her efforts were not enough to overcome the turbulent times.

Rose, who will remain at CPS until May 31, said her decision to leave was a “mutual agreement” with the district.

“I came to the district to serve the public,” Rose said. “At this point, I feel that I can best serve the public outside of the district.”

Although many parents and community members have openly supported lengthening CPS’ school day and shuttering or turning around struggling neighborhood schools, public reaction in some parts of the city has been fiercely critical.

In February, Local School Council members at 17 schools filed a lawsuit, claiming that CPS’ school closings were discriminatory and intended to silence parental voice in school decisions. That case has since been dismissed. Elsewhere, parents and community activists have staged rowdy protests at schools designated to be closed and at City Hall to make their opposition known.

Last month, dozens of parents, activists and community members flooded CPS’ school board chambers to oppose the closing or restructuring of 17 struggling public schools. The emotionally charged meeting lasted 31/2 hours, but at the end school board members unanimously approved all school actions.

“The department (of community engagement) has always just been window dressing for CPS, pretending to listen to parents and the community,” said Julie Woestehoff, executive director of the advocacy group Parents United for Responsible Education. “The bottom line is, they’re not interested in including the public in their decisions at all.”

District spokeswoman Becky Carroll declined to talk about Rose’s resignation, but she said community and family engagement is a crucial component of CPS’ mission.

“Historically, CPS has not done as good a job as it should have engaging families,” Carroll said. “And we are working to fundamentally change that with a new approach … to ensure that we have the most responsive and proactive effort in place to fully engage and empower parents.”

nahmed@tribune.com jhood@tribune.com

Whistleblower Knows the Truth

11 Mar

Kathleen Carroll, an attorney and fired whistleblower at the California Commission On Teacher Credentials attended the March 5, 2012 rally for public education at the State Capitol and talks about the organized destruction of public education in California and who is responsible for this crisis. Included in her comments is the role of Apple and other online education companies who are draining funds from public schools. She also calls for the investigation and prosecution of illegal actions by lobbyists funded by the Gates Foundation and Broad Foundation who are illegally voting on public money to private schools in which they have an economic interest. She questions why California Attorney General Kamala Harris has refused to investigate and also whey Governor Jerry Brown is continuing to allow criminal activity at the Commission On Teacher Credentials. The California Commission On Teacher Credentials is under the direct authority of Governor Brown and his office.
For further video on Kathleen Carroll go to:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOCjDI2WxZA&feature
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56SWb4z5-l4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLa6YCVB-8A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ux7F71oUo0
Production of Labor Video Project www.laborvideo.org

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFlOt-r5z90&feature=player_embedded

Diane Ravitch Speaks Out!

8 Mar

Why are the elites of both parties so eager to hand children and public dollars over to private corporations? Why are both parties complicit in the dismantling of public education? Why do so many Democrats at the top advocate what used to be known as the right-wing agenda for education? Is it all about campaign contributions? Why does the media let them get away with it? Why does anyone think that this will be good for our society in the short term or the long term? Why have the monied interests decided to privatize large swaths of public education? What happens to our democracy when the public sector is effectively whittled away or purchased by big money? Diane

Pema Chodron Speaks Out

7 Mar

March 7, 2012

FEARLESSNESS AND PATIENCE

Fearlessness is another ingredient of patience. If you want to practice patience that leads to the cessation of suffering, to the de-escalation of aggression, it means cultivating a fearlessness that is both compassionate and brave. Because at this point you’re getting to know anger and how it easily breeds violent words and actions, and this can be decidedly unnerving.

Ombudsman Program vs. Roosevelt & Page Park

5 Mar

Ombudsman program fails to meet the needs of students
By Jennifer Macek
My name is Jennifer Macek. I grew up in Rockford, I attended the Rockford Public Schools, and I did my senior research paper for my bachelor of science on the history of the Rockford Public Schools. Currently, I am a teacher, parent and resident of District 205. I am working on my doctorate in curriculum and instruction at Northern Illinois University, I am a certified instruction for CPI for this district, and I was previously employed by Ombudsman in Loves Park.
I am writing to ask you to listen to reason. For too long, this district has looked for the quick fix to many complex issues. For too long, we have tried to fix long-term problems with short-term solutions. For too long, the district has made cuts and changes to save money that resulted in waste, increased spending and a decrease in revenue. Examples of this include implementing programs, such as ENI that cost more than $5 million that the district scrapped after purchasing all the materials and training staff, and closing schools that resulted in the People who Care lawsuit, which cost the district millions of dollars. Now, we are looking at new programs and changes to existing programs that take this district one step forward and two steps back.
Along with several of my colleagues in the Alternative High School program, I am putting together a think tank to help make the board, the district and the community aware of the direction currently being offered and the consequences that will follow should the board implement the recommendations the district is making. We are also investigating alternatives that will be cost effective and economically efficient for the present and the long run, without jeopardizing academic integrity.
We will be looking at the Ombudsman program in depth. Already, we have found that the statistics presented to our staff by Matt Vosberg Feb. 15 are misleading. He stated that Ombudsman has an 85 percent graduation rate, when according to their website they have 85 percent who graduate, earn credits OR return to their home school. There are many other aspects of this program that fail to meet the needs of our students, and we will be sharing that information as soon as we compile all that is needed to ensure our information is valid.
We will also share the new initiatives Roosevelt has implemented to promote efficiency and success. These improvements began prior to the information we received regarding the proposed changes. Under new leadership, we have created an excellent system for promoting student accountability and academic progress.
In addition, our task force is brainstorming and researching alternatives, such as the following:
1. Ways to increase economic efficiency within an already well-established program (Roosevelt Model of Learning).
2. Creating a credit recovery program within each high school so students who fail first semester subjects are not set up to fail the second semester, etc.
3. Implementing an alternative program at the middle school level.
4. Changing the programming at Page Park to offer credit recovery, to enhance student buy-in and promote student success.
5. Implementing curriculum changes that boost test scores throughout the district.
6. Allowing elementary teachers the freedom to use the proposed extended day for enrichment and RTI, as needed, with the direct goal of decreasing the need for credit recovery in the future.
We will continue to brainstorm and complete research that will provide the board with the best options to implement money-saving strategies that truly promote the highest standards available. We are doing this because we love our school, our students, and our community; because our students love our school and have found success here. We want to have a world-class education for ALL students. We are not doing this because we are being paid $180,000 a year to do so. We are not doing this because we are trying to save our jobs (we’ve already been told we will have them), and not because we are trying to defy anyone. We are doing this because we care. We understand the current economy, and we want what is best for everyone involved. As a taxpayer, a parent and a teacher of this district, I urge you to listen to reason.
P.S. — The above was written prior to learning about the changes proposed for Roosevelt. I planned to read it at the next board meeting, but now feel we need to move quickly, before any damage is done to the community I care so much about.
From the Feb. 29-March 6, 2012, issue

No Public Education, No Democracy!

28 Feb

Brave New World

by SIMONE HARRIS

I teach English at Montgomery High School in Santa Rosa, California.  I love my school, my amazing colleagues, and the kids who enter my classroom each year.  But I hate what is happening to public education.

From the national to the local level, our public schools are under attack, and that means our students are under attack.  This attack takes more than one form.  The cuts to vital education services are horrifying enough, but they’re only half the picture.  The other half is the violation of our public trust by private interests.

It’s not a pretty sight, but we must look squarely at the vultures of privatization that prey on the damage to our schools, from New York to New Orleans to Wisconsin to California.  Diane Ravitch, former Assistant Secretary of Education in the first Bush administration, refers to the three big education funders, Bill Gates, Eli Broad and the Walton Family, as the Billionaire Boys Club in her excellent book The Death and Life of the Great American School System.  Ravitch has come a long way since her days of working under Bush Sr.  I’ve even heard people refer to her as the Noam Chomsky of education, a sure sign of how far to the right our political culture has drifted.

But we were talking about vultures.  These corporations are poised to supply the artificial heart of learning to a wounded public school system they fully intend to finish off.  But they won’t succeed. No they won’t because our communities are going to fight for our beloved schools, we teachers are going to fight for our students, and our students are going to demand the education they deserve!

There are so many intelligent, talented, compassionate educators who were called to this profession.  Teaching was a calling for me.  I’m in this for the long haul, and by this I mean public education.  I’m going to stand up for the right that all young people have to a quality education.

Education is a right.  Education is a human right; it’s not a humiliating race for basic funding, something the Obama administration and Education Secretary Arne Duncan would do well to remember.  Education is indeed a right, and yet did you know there is more segregation in our schools today than at any time since 1968, the year of Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination?  The corporate obsession with charter schools and high stakes tests has contributed mightily to this segregation while shamefully distracting us from the poverty and income inequality that go hand in hand with it.

I’m not going to lie down while corporations prey on our students.  I don’t want to see our nation’s young people at the mercy of a Rupert Murdoch or a Michael Milken.  Do you remember Michael Milken, the former felon and Junk Bond King of the eighties?  Michael Milkin is co-founder of K-12 Inc., America’s largest provider of online education for kindergarten through 12th grade.

Do you know what an online school is?  That’s the one that exists inside of a computer.  These days, kids can conduct their entire social lives on a computer and get all their schooling done there too.  They never even have to leave the house.  It’s very compact, very efficient, but there is one missing link: the human link, the spacious beauty of the human bond.

Online or virtual schools typically have high withdrawal rates, and that’s not surprising.  It makes sense, doesn’t it?  It must be very tempting to drop out of a “school” when there are no human beings there in person to make you feel connected to a real community, no gym, no playground, no student art on the walls, and no teacher to get to know you, to care, to see who you are and who you might one day become.

The bitter irony is that these online schools are marketed to English learners who need the exact opposite of isolation, who benefit most from cooperative strategies in natural, not virtual, settings.

Or they are preposterously promoted as beneficial to low income students as though it were a good thing to get education at a discount, off the rack. As Diane Ravitch warns of the educational dystopia that is fast gaining on reality, “the poor will get computers and the rich will get computers and teachers.”

The corporate predators also target struggling learners, kids with learning disabilities or emotional problems; in other words, the very kids who need human engagement and interaction the most.  And make no mistake: all kids need it!  One shudders to imagine children as young as five attending a virtual school.  It’s a Brave New World, and I’m not just saying that because I’m an English teacher.

Our district right here in Santa Rosa has just launched an online charter school.  I understand we are paying for it in-house, no involvement from Michael Milkin, not as far as I know, not yet anyway.  But our community needs to ask critical questions about this online school nonetheless, especially when we are told to expect teacher layoffs this March.

According to SRTA President Andy Brennan, the district promised this online venture would be geared toward homeschooled kids but in spite of that claim, they have recruited from our general population.  They forwarded a letter of recruitment to all department chairs in the district and got over 200 applicants.

So why are we diverting precious resources from our actual schools toward this virtual school?  What priorities does this decision reflect?  Who made the decision that an online school was good for our kids?  Were studies consulted, and if so, which ones and with what level of scrutiny? The argument that getting the bulk of one’s education through a computer will give kids marketable technological skills is wholly unconvincing without evidence that students of these virtual schools actually get hired in these fields.  Do the jobs that require these technological skills even exist in the present U.S. economy or have they been outsourced to other countries?

Finally, is it possible that, in our district as in so many others, what is good for our kids once again lost out to the bottom line, the almighty dollar?  These are some of the questions we must ask.

Another question is why we allow Michael Milken, a man who wouldn’t be allowed inside of a real classroom because of his felony conviction, to make a profit off of marketing his online curriculum to kindergartners.

Letting the business world gain control of our public schools has many sad consequences, but there is no question that it is making a few people very rich.  There is a reason that Rupert Murdoch referred to the for-profit K-12 education industry as, and I quote, “a $500 billion sector in the U.S. alone that is waiting desperately to be transformed.”  I’d like to keep Rupert Murdoch waiting desperately until the end of time.  How about you?

And we can’t forget the Walton Family.  The Walton Family spent $157 million dollars on Ed Reform in 2010 alone and has spent $1 billion to date on pushing charter schools and busting teachers unions.  Do we really want the people behind Walmart to set the education agenda for America?  Something is definitely wrong with this picture.

We hear so much these days about standards in education and holding teachers accountable to the standards.  Ask yourself what the Walmart standard of education might be – You’ve heard of the chain store, so now consider the chain school, all those unique kids across the nation being force-fed one standardized diet of junk learning.  It’s the fast food of education these corporations are pushing.  And when I consider the current and future classes of 40 plus students due to budget cuts, the term “supersize me” takes on a whole new meaning.  Hey, how big can an online class get?  Supersize me.

But these days in education, it’s not fashionable to examine the big picture, to ask too many questions about what students are learning and why we are teaching it to them.  It’s not recommended for the teacher and it’s not prescribed for the student.  Nevertheless, we teachers are not about to give up on critical thinking within or beyond the walls of the classroom.

Here is one critical piece of the big picture: The Walton Family owns more wealth than the bottom 40% of the whole U.S. while one in five kids here live in poverty. There is no question that poverty is a huge factor in the success of students.  It accounts for 60% of student achievement!

Finland, the country whose scores in international test comparisons we’ve been holding up as a model, has high-performing schools in large part because they do things like provide food and free health-care for their students.  And not incidentally, they don’t have standardized tests.  They understand that a quality education emerges from a strong community and a humane society.  Why can’t we figure that out here in the U.S., in the wealthiest country in the world?

So if the Walton family really wants to improve education, then maybe they should start supporting Single Payer Healthcare. Maybe they should launch a massive campaign to end child poverty.  And no education reform effort would be complete without a major challenge to the corporate stranglehold on our system of government.  Come to think of it, these philanthropists, as they like to think of themselves, might want to join the Occupy Movement.  Except they’re the owners of Walmart, a conflict of interest to say the least.

The 1% is hoping that if America continues to blame teachers for everything then they will forget to tax the millionaires.  But we here today can’t afford to forget the real scope of the problem.  So as an English teacher, I decided to end my speech today with a nod to the parts of speech.

We can’t forget that Occupy was a verb before it became a noun.  Whatever you believe about your political identity, your party affiliation, your status in America today, please don’t forget to occupy your conscience, your activism, and your humanity. We need to vote in California to fund public education and other essential human services, and I am giving my support to the Millionaires Tax Initiative supported by the California Federation of Teachers and the California Nurses Association.  But we need to do more than rouse ourselves for intermittent election cycles.  We need to occupy our hearts, our minds, and our capacity for critical thinking.  We can’t go back to sleep.

People everywhere are waking up to the radical threat that corporations pose, to our global economy, to our planet and to our very existence as a species.  And let’s not forget that corporations are a threat to our democracy, to the self-determination of people all over the world.  Without public education, there can be no democracy.

This is why we reject this authoritarian education mandated by an illegitimate corporate power.  We must overthrow the plutocracy!  We must demand our human rights! And we cannot afford to wait timidly for politicians powered by big money to give their lukewarm legislative blessings to our kids’ fundamental human rights.  We the people need to take to the streets to demand those rights, to demand the legislation that is just and fair in the wealthiest country in the world. We are the decision-makers and we are the people!

I would never have become a teacher if I didn’t believe in the power of people to change the world, and especially the power of young people.  Students, I know you can change the world!  You can change the world!  I believe in you.

Simone Harris is a high school English teacher, activist, and blogger who writes about the politics of education at theedutalk.blogspot.com.

Who do you trust?

28 Feb

Trust! The Rockford School District asks us to trust their decisions to do better for our at-risk students at Page Park and Roosevelt Alternative High School. How often have they done what’s best for students and staff over the past 7 years? Over that time, the district has outsourced employees, humiliated staff members with premature lay-offs and pink slips, overspent public monies, increased the number of administrators downtown with costly benefits and salaries, retained a convicted felon on staff while firing many teachers for minor infractions, closed schools and programs, bought a new board office building, held board and committee meetings in cramped and an unsafe environment that limits the populace, evaded the truth requiring costly and time consuming Freedom of Information Act requests, and now have forced teachers to reach an impasse with contract negotiations! Their words are hollow because the truth has been twisted, evaded, or never revealed at all. The common welfare of people throughout the district has not been safeguarded by our decision makers, and it’s time to speak up. According to John Adams, “The only maxim of a freegovernment ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty.”

According to Matt Vosberg, assistant superintendent of the Rockford School District in last Sunday’s Rockford Register Star, the district wants to outsource Roosevelt & Page Park to the Ombudsman Model of delivering an education to our at-risk students. It’s all about dollars and sense (common, that is), too often missing from decisions made by people in power and imposed on our students and staff. Why should we trust this district after their track record? Last year, speech pathologists were laid off, which left us searching frantically for qualified teachers to service our students properly for their mandated minutes. How short-sighted! These teachers have valuable skills that were appreciated elsewhere so who could blame them for leaving Rockford? How cost effective was that decision?

Yet, Mr. Vosberg swears not one teaching job will be lost by using Ombudsman, which brings their own staff with them. Believe him? I don’t. After the record of teacher lay-offs and poor faith negotiations, embattled teachers are weary and mistrustful. That’s why many retire rather than deal with the ineptitude and unethical treatment by detached administrators. So Rockford is losing valued teachers as mentors for new staff, who offer stability with classroom management experience, curriculum skills, and common sense. Another point, we wish to debate with Mr. Vosberg is that he says many of the demographics serviced by Ombudsman schools is similar to Rockford’s. While this business serves 120 school districts, very few are comparable to Rockford in enrollment numbers and poverty rates. According to the Ombudsman brochure, they service:

40% in Illinois

20% in Georgia

40% in 18 other states

8% have FRL rates greater than 75% (we are somewhere in the upper 70′s)

70% have FRL rates less than 50%

75% of the Illinois districts have FRL less than 20%

4% of the districts are 28,000 students or more (we are somewhere around 28,500)

80% of the districts are 10,000 students or less

62% are 5,000 or less

In Naperville, the poverty rate is 5% and Rockford’s is 78%. Clearly Ombudsman of Naperville does not service many school districts as large or impoverished as Rockford’s. There really wasn’t any district that mirrored Rockford because most districts in the 20,000-40,000 student size had much lower FRL (Free Lunch) rate than we do. Bibb County in Georgia has 25,000 students with 70% FRL, which was the closest to ours. When Superintendent Willis was interviewed by Elizabeth Fay (Channel 13) he stated this regarding the Ombudsman program, “They (the students) get reinforcement constantly from a teacher in the room. There’s a teacher who works with them, not teaching them, but supporting them.” Oh, that’s right! They don’t need to teach the student; let the computer do that work. Anyone can do what a teacher does: support, nurse, counsel, patrol, protect, encourage, grade, direct, listen, and finally teach when there’s time!

 A positive note for our students from Roosevelt, they won the Truth Talk Debate last week-end and two of our students have won Scholastic art awards. What is the district public relations department doing to promote such positive stories about Roosevelt? So much for our at-risk students…and any limitations the district believes about them or our program at Roosevelt. “I have a perfect horror of words that are not backed up by deeds,” according to our namesake Teddy Roosevelt. So, as a teacher at Page Park or Roosevelt, who would you trust?

 Jane Hayes, current teacher at Roosevelt and member of WEE, Watchdogs for Ethics in Education

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUpO5tqmbRQ You Tube video with Dr. Willis

http://www.rrstar.com/news/schools/x1771577894/Rockford-school-official-No-layoffs-in-alternative-education-proposal Article by Matt Vosberg Sunday’s Rockford Register Star, Feb 26, 2012

http://www.ombudsman.com/index.aspx Ombudsman site

You Tube Truth

26 Feb

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUpO5tqmbRQ

Education Committee Meets

22 Feb

Thursday, Feb 23, 2012, at the old school board building on Madison, the ed committee will meet at 5:00 p.m. to discuss the future of Alternative Education in Rockford. Please show up and have your views expressed. 

Outsourcing Roosevelt High, Abandoning Its Staff & Students

21 Feb

 

Under Dennis Thompson’s superintendency of the Rockford Public Schools, our custodial staff of nearly 200 was outsourced in 2005. According to a May 20, 2005, article in the Rockford Register Star, the retired army colonel was a curriculum director in Nashville before coming to Rockford and was a tae kwon do black belt who admitted he liked a good fight.  At the time of the outsourcing, the savings to the district was estimated at $2-3 million; however, the morale we lost has never been recovered. The cleaning contract went to the GCA Services maintenance company that created more havoc, discord, and problems. At the time, I questioned this decision because the janitors I knew at Eisenhower and Guilford were part of our school families assisting with numerous tasks beyond their job descriptions.

At the time, what the uninformed populace didn’t understand was that more outsourcing was yet to come. Now, we have outsourced security at our schools. Next, we will be outsourcing  teachers at Roosevelt Alternative High School, but the sad fact is that what we are really doing is outsourcing our minority and at-risk students, those marginalized because of attendance violations and tragic personal lives, students who have been unable to succeed in a regular classroom setting. At Roosevelt, we work on credit recovery for our students; but in essence, what we really do is repair the damaged or sidetracked lives of our students by supporting them with psych-social-emotional stability and resources. Our students have been denied the extensive support system elsewhere because of curricular restraints and overcrowding so we at Roosevelt have offered an imperative lifeline to our at-risk students.

Just as Luke from the 1967 movie Cool Hand Luke unmasked the hypocrisy and injustice of the prison system, the ladies of WEE, Watchdogs for Ethics in Education, are still working to unmask the same in our public school system. WEE will not be puppets to the restraints and special interests of the Nashville Schools and their cohorts in Rockford who are coordinating efforts to privatize our schools. Our strings are too tight with the students and staff we represent. WEE will not condone this latest public school fiasco of outsourcing Roosevelt and its caring staff.  When the Roosevelt staff received the news of the demise of their program, they were also told their replacement would be the Ombudsman Plus program, with strong roots in Nashville. Interesting connection since our school board and administrators have been wooed into the Nashville scene by the Alignment Rockford program! According to the priceless line from Cool Hand Luke, the movie from 1967, “What we got here is a failure to communicate!” We are appalled at the lack of respect and professionalism espoused by this administration, which excludes teachers from pivotal decisions impacting their futures and those of their students.

Investigative reporting has been done by Lisa Black of the Chicago Tribune regarding the lack of state approved credentials for the Ombudsman Plus organization, and the article can be read at the source below. By the way, ombudsman is a Norse word meaning a neutral representative. What kind of neutral representative has a lucrative vested interest in making money from our at-risk students? What a misnomer! According to the Tribune article, Waukegan’s district paid $560,000 for 25 students and Lyons Township paid $705,000 to teach up to 30 students. Remember, this program is computer-based so the interaction between the student and staff member is minimized. Remember, this Ombudsman program is a business looking for monetary gain and not a public school system looking for the best alternative education program for needy students. We at Roosevelt are qualified to work with at-risk students and offer them our personal, academic, and social support so why are we being outsourced?

Well, guess what? The WEE women understand the impropriety and unethical treatment done to the staff at Roosevelt and its long-term effects on our students so we are ready and willing to uncover whatever we can to disclose the idiocy of this decision and the tangled web our administrators have with the Nashville connection! We will not walk away from the plight; indeed, we intend to fight for the cause of public education. And, we promise not to deceive but to disclose what we find in the Rock River Times!

Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive, Sir Walter Scott.

Jane Hayes, currently teaching at Roosevelt High School

 

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2010-06-17/health/ct-met-ombudsman-0616-20100617_1_ombudsman-educational-services-school-districts-state-board-spokeswoman
Tribune Article

http://esa-education.com/Divisions/ombudsman.aspx 

http://www.ombudsman.com/index.aspx

 

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.